Fingernail Drug Test Vs Hair Follicle Testing Method

Drug testing is an increasingly important part of many workplaces, schools and other institutions. Two common methods of drug testing are fingernail drug tests and hair follicle tests. This article will compare the two methods to identify which one may be more effective in detecting illicit substances.

Fingernail drug tests have become popular due to their convenience and affordability. It involves collecting a clipping from the subject’s fingernails that can then be tested for traces of drugs such as cocaine and marijuana. The results are usually available within 24 hours or less.

Hair follicle testing has been around for decades but only became widely used over the past few years. This method requires taking a sample of hair from the subject’s scalp and analyzing it for evidence of drugs like opioids or methamphetamine. Results typically take three days or longer, however this test offers greater accuracy than fingernail drug tests since it can detect drug usage up to 90-days prior to sampling.

 

Select Your Test – Pass With Peace of Mind

Urine Test Hair Test Mouth Swab Test Urine Test
Clear Choice Rescue Cleanse

Clear Choice Rescue Cleanse

A detox drink that  flushes out toxins from the body to pass a urine or blood drug test.

Old Style Aloe Toxin Rid Shampoo

Old Style Aloe Toxin Rid Shampoo

A shampoo that effectively removes drug metabolites from hair to pass any hair test.

Oral Clear Gum

Oral Clear Gum

A gum that completely removes drug metabolites from the saliva in order to pass a drug test.

Quick Luck Synthetic Urine

Quick Luck Synthetic Urine

A kit that contains 100% effective synthetic urine and a heating pad to simulate natural urine and pass your drug test.

 

Overview Of Drug Testing Methods

Drug testing is a process used to detect the presence of drugs in an individual’s body. It can be conducted for various reasons such as medical purposes, pre-employment screening and monitoring drug use among employees or students. Drug testing methods vary depending on the type of sample taken from the individual being tested. Two common examples of drug testing are fingernail drug test and hair follicle test.

Fingernail drug tests involve collecting small clippings of finger nails, which typically contain traces of any drugs that were ingested by the person during the past three months. Hair follicle testing involves taking strands of hair at least one inch long from close to the scalp; this method allows detection of substances that were consumed up to 90 days prior. Both these tests have their own advantages and disadvantages and it should be noted that they do not provide information about current intoxication levels but only show if there has been any recent substance abuse.

 

Advantages Of Fingernail Testing

Fingernail drug testing is seen as a more efficient and cost effective method of detecting recent drug use compared to the hair follicle test. The primary advantage of this type of testing is that it can detect drugs in the system up to 90 days after ingestion, which is longer than most other tests. This extended detection window means that employers are able to gain an insight into an employee’s long-term substance abuse habits. Furthermore, fingernail drug testing does not require extensive sample collection procedures since only small amounts of nails need to be clipped from each finger. Additionally, unlike with hair strand samples, results are obtained immediately without any waiting period for lab analysis. Finally, because fingernails tend to store their growth history over time due to their slow rate of cell turnover, they may provide more detailed information about past drug usage than those generated through urine or saliva tests.

 

Disadvantages Of Fingernail Testing

Despite its many advantages, fingernail testing does have certain drawbacks. Though it is generally more accurate than other types of drug tests, it may not be as reliable when looking for long-term use of drugs. Fingernails typically take longer to grow out than hair follicles and therefore cannot detect very recent drug usage or chronic usage over an extended period of time. Additionally, the test results can vary depending on where in a person’s nail sample was taken from – if too close to the cuticle, there might not have been enough time for traces of drugs to show up in the test results; conversely, if too far away from the cuticle then the test results could produce inaccurate readings due to aging residue that has built up over time. Finally, since fingernail testing requires physical contact with the subject’s nails during collection and analysis, it carries a greater risk of cross-contamination which can lead to false positives or incorrect interpretation by laboratory technicians.

 

Advantages Of Hair Follicle Testing

Hair follicle testing is a reliable method for drug detection due to the fact that foreign substances, such as drugs and metabolites, can remain in hair strands for long periods of time. Hair tests are able to detect substance abuse up to 90 days after consumption, making them more effective than other drug screening methods like urine or saliva tests which usually only detect use within the past few days. Additionally, because it requires removal of a sample directly from an individual’s body, there is less chance of tampering with results compared to alternative methods of drug testing that rely on samples taken away from the person being tested. This makes hair follicle testing one of the most accurate forms of drug screenings available today. The cost associated with this form of testing is also relatively low compared to other types and thus may be preferable when considering larger scale operations like workplace drug screens. Furthermore, hair analysis provides an extended window period allowing employers sufficient time to make decisions based on confirmed results.

 

Disadvantages Of Hair Follicle Testing

Hair follicle testing has several disadvantages when compared to fingernail drug tests. The main drawbacks are:

  • Cost – Hair follicle tests usually cost more than fingernail drug tests, as they require specialized equipment and personnel to process the sample.
  • Time Constraints – Depending on the laboratory used, hair follicle testing can take up to two weeks or longer for results. This is significantly longer than a standard urine test which typically only takes 48 hours or less.
  • Privacy Issues – A hair sample contains genetic information that may be accessible to law enforcement, insurance companies, and other entities depending on the type of test conducted. In addition, some individuals may find it invasive if someone must collect their hair from them in order for the test to be administered properly.
  • Difficulty Collecting Samples – It can sometimes be difficult to obtain enough hairs from certain areas (e.g., the scalp) due to thinning or baldness; this could lead to false negatives if not enough samples were obtained during collection.

In spite of these drawbacks, hair follicle testing is still considered an effective method of detecting recent drug use due its extended detection window and accuracy rate. However, it is important for employers and organizations considering using this form of screening to weigh all factors before making a decision about what type of drug test best suits their needs.

 

Select Your Test – Pass With Peace of Mind

Urine Test Hair Test Mouth Swab Test Urine Test
Clear Choice Rescue Cleanse

Clear Choice Rescue Cleanse

A detox drink that  flushes out toxins from the body to pass a urine or blood drug test.

Old Style Aloe Toxin Rid Shampoo

Old Style Aloe Toxin Rid Shampoo

A shampoo that effectively removes drug metabolites from hair to pass any hair test.

Oral Clear Gum

Oral Clear Gum

A gum that completely removes drug metabolites from the saliva in order to pass a drug test.

Quick Luck Synthetic Urine

Quick Luck Synthetic Urine

A kit that contains 100% effective synthetic urine and a heating pad to simulate natural urine and pass your drug test.

 

Comparing The Two Methods

Fingernail and hair follicle drug tests are two of the most popular methods used to detect drugs in an individual. While these tests have similar goals, they differ significantly in terms of their accuracy, convenience, cost, and invasiveness. The following table summarizes the main differences between fingernail and hair follicle drug testing:

Fingernail Drug Test Hair Follicle Test
Accuracy  High  Moderate/High
Convenience  Easy to collect sample. Can be done at home or sent via mail. Results available within 24-48 hours. More invasive than a fingernail test; must go to a lab for collection. Results usually available within 7 days but can take up to 3 weeks if laboratory is backed up. 
Cost  Generally more expensive than hair follicles due to the need for specialized equipment and analysis. May also require certified personnel to perform the test correctly. 
Invasiveness  No invasivo ya que solo requiere cortar una pequeña porción de una uña de cada mano (o dedo). No hay dolor involucrado. No requiere asistencia ni certificación de un profesional de la salud para la interpretación de los resultados, siempre y cuando se sigan las pautas aprobadas. Más invasivo que una prueba de uñas; implica cortar una porción significativa del cabello de la persona (generalmente de 0,5 a 1 pulgada), lo que causa cierta incomodidad durante el proceso de recolección. Debe ser recolectado por un técnico calificado que haya sido capacitado en las metodologías adecuadas al recolectar muestras para garantizar resultados precisos.

With regards to accuracy, both methods offer reliable results with slight variations depending on factors such as how recently drugs were used or how much was taken by an individual prior taking either type of test . In general, finger nails provide more accurate results compared to hair follicles because they contain traces of recent drug use while hairs may indicate past usage that occurred several months ago . On the other hand , though slightly less accurate , hair follicle tests tend to be more convenient since there is not any special equipment required and samples can easily be obtained from any location . Furthermore , despite its higher cost , fingernail drug testing provides noninvasive procedures making them ideal for individuals unwilling (or unable) to undergo traditional blood testing . Therefore , it all comes down personal preference and needs when selecting between these two types of tests .

 

Conclusion

Drug testing has become an important means of detecting drug use in recent years. There are a variety of methods available, including fingernail and hair follicle tests. Fingernail testing can provide results quickly with minimal disruption to individuals being tested but is limited by the short window of detection and lack of ability to detect drugs over extended periods of time. Hair follicle testing provides a longer window for detection, allowing for more comprehensive analysis, however it requires more sample material than fingernail testing. Ultimately, which method should be used depends on individual circumstances as each offers advantages and disadvantages that must be weighed carefully before making a decision.

Both fingernail and hair follicle tests have their respective benefits depending upon the situation at hand. For instance, when attempting to detect shorter-term drug usage or when conducting larger scale screenings where less intrusive samples may be preferable, then finger nail testing might be chosen due to its speedier processing times and lower costs associated with collection procedures. On the other hand, if there is need for a longer window of detection or precision in determining patterns of substance abuse over time then hair follicle testing would likely prove more beneficial given its broader range of application possibilities.

In conclusion, both fingernail and hair follicle drug test methods offer significant value in helping identify those who are using illicit substances; yet which one should be utilized depends largely on the specific goals intended to be achieved through such screening efforts. It is therefore recommended that administrators consider all relevant factors when deciding between these two popular forms of drug testing in order to ensure optimal outcomes from any such initiative undertaken.

Scroll to Top